Floating on and selling out: 2004 was the year "indie" lost all meaning
Can you feel nostalgic for something that never happened? If so, the recent Paramount Plus series Lolla: The Story of Lollapalooza offers up a few hauntological pangs for Lollapalooza 2004. That year the venerable music festival was supposed to tour sixteen cities, with a two-day bill—headlined by Morrissey, Sonic Youth, Modest Mouse, and a newly reunited Pixies on one day, and jam-and-jam-adjacent bands like The String Cheese Incident and Gomez on the other—that was meant to return Lollapalooza to its more “alternative” roots, after a shaky 2003 comeback had gone heavy on chug-rockers like Audioslave and Incubus. Lollapalooza would “embody the spirit of the gypsy!” once more, its co-founder Perry Farrell gushed, while Farrell’s less-poetic partner, Marc Geiger, swooned that they were newly refocused on “eclectic music not driven by the commercial marketplace.” It was a prophecy quickly fulfilled when the whole thing was scrapped due to low ticket sales.There were lots of reasons why Lollapalooza 2004 failed to launch. It was a dismal year for summer tours in general. Lollapalooza was facing increasingly stiff competition from the other festivals it had inspired, like the Warped Tour, Bonnaroo, and Coachella. And as contemporary critics pointed out, its lineup appealed primarily to aging Gen-Xers, who had neither the time nor the lower backs to expend on music festivals anymore, and whose interest in jam bands likely ranged from nil to “vaguely familiar with Phish.” But in Lolla, Geiger suggests the death of Lollapalooza 2004 represented a more existential crisis. “We’d been through so much, the ups and downs,” he laments, over the kind of somber synth tones normally reserved for Dateline. “Trying to stay on edge where there just isn’t an edge anymore.” This elusive “edge” had bedeviled Lollapalooza since its beginning in 1991, of course, when the festival’s tidy commercialization of the counterculture had seemed so immediately obvious, it only took The Simpsons five years to make fun of it. But by 2004, the notion that there was any “edge” left to exploit felt especially quaint. “Alternative” music had been languishing for nearly a decade beneath a sloppy glurge of post-grunge, rap-rock, nu-metal, and third-wave ska. Around the turn of the millennium, groups like The Strokes, The White Stripes, and The Yeah Yeah Yeahs had been hailed as the “saviors of rock” just for wresting the genre away from the aggro mooks, playing music—although tagged with Orwellian Newspeak labels like “neo-garage,” “new new wave,” and “post-punk revival”—that was more broadly lumped under the catchall of “indie.” And for a few glorious years, indie had owned whatever “edge” still remained. But by 2004, indie music was suddenly everywhere, its success driven not only by the commercial marketplace, but by actual commercials. It had never been more massive, nor more mainstream. It had never been more meaningless.What had “indie” ever meant, if anything? Here I’ll ease my creaky bones down onto this gnarled tree stump and explain that, in the olden days, “indie” used to mean that your music was released on an independent label, whether by circumstance or some ethical choice. But by 2004, those distinctions had all but disappeared. It wasn’t just that The Strokes, The White Stripes, and The Yeah Yeah Yeahs had all signed to major labels. It was that the Internet was making labels themselves largely irrelevant. In the great, open-air bazaar of MP3 downloads, there was no longer any practical difference between an “indie” band and a major-label one. More abstractly, “indie” had once suggested a kind of hip erudition, the kind you had to work for by going to small club shows, scouring zines, or withstanding the withering condescension of a record-store clerk. But the Internet changed that, too. As LCD Soundsystem’s James Murphy observed in 2001’s “Losing My Edge,” there was now an entire generation of “Internet seekers” who could torrent a band’s discography overnight. And in 2004, just about everyone had heard of Pitchfork, whose 9.7 review of Arcade Fire’s Funeral that September catapulted the Montreal group to overnight success, and anointed Pitchfork itself as a cultural authority capable of making or breaking bands with a single glowing endorsement or snarkily deployed GIF.“Indie,” like “alternative” before it, had always required some baseline to oppose, and that was still mostly true in 2004. Glossy pop, rap, and R&B ruled the radio. The early ‘00s were the era of the “socialite,” some of whom even had their own hit albums, and broadly speaking, post-9/11 America had curled up into a lotus-eating haze of late-capitalist nightmare reality shows like The Simple Life, The Swan, and The Apprentice that celebrated excess and artificiality. The nation’s number-one series, American Idol, manufactured new pop stars with the audience’s enthusiastic participation, and its winners—and even some of its losers—dominated the Billboard charts
What's Your Reaction?